Who Is Doing The Killing? – Radio Free South Africa

9th June, 2012

“You assist an evil system most effectively by obeying its orders and decrees. An evil system never deserves such allegiance. Allegiance to it, means partaking of the evil. A good person will resist an evil system with his or her whole soul.” – Gandhi

Whenever white genocide, or black on white violence, or farm murders are discussed we always find white liberals and anti-white blacks denying it. Particularly in the case of South Africa one cannot base such discussions on statistics, because the SA Government’s statistics are far from trustworthy. This ANC government is so rotten and ridden with fraud and corruption that accepting their statistics as trustworthy would irrational. Nothing coming from the ANC Regime can be believed or trusted in anyway whatsoever.

Focusing on the black on white only would also result in accusations of racism, as racism is always is the defence-weapon of choice.

To this end we shall be focusing not only on black on white violence, but also on black on black violence, to demonstrate that the problem, even when whites were to be removed all together, is a black violence problem. At the same time we also hope to demonstrate how this black violence problem threatens, not only black people themselves, but the future of whites generally.

Black on White Crime in South Africa is a serious threat to the survival of whites on the African continent. Notwithstanding this fact, we consistently find the liberal media, liberal political parties, churches, leaders at all levels and foreigners shying away from the fact, denying it, explaining it away, finding excuses for the violence, trying to to present the murders as as mere petty crime gone wrong.

We even find them blaming the violence against whites on whites themselves, “due to the legacy of Apartheid”, “due to the injustices of colonialism”, “whites still own the majority of land”, “whites still own most of the businesses”, whites this, and whites that, but never the blacks. It is politically incorrect to say it as it is, black-on-white violence.

“It is just too easy to pass this off as “black anger.” It is racism and the Zimmerman-Martin killing is just the tip of the iceberg. Despite decades since the passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964 that was passed to redress the wrongs of the past against black Americans, some blacks retain a malignant hatred directed against whites.” – Ozzie Saffa

“Voicing disapproval of the black on white violence that is rampant in South Africa is a hazardous undertaking in Obamaland. Even being a cop defending our right to express such speech is dangerous.” – Assaulted by Occucommies for Objecting to Black on White Violence, by Dave Blount

The media has been particularly silent on black-on-white violence and a number of articles tried to address the problem if the media’s “political correctness”. The following are just a few examples published recently:

Media continues to censor black on white crime – By Kyle Rogers, June 7, 2012

Is A Race War Being Censored To Avoid White Backlash? – By THOMAS SOWELL, May 14, 2012

Black-on-White Crime and the Reasons for a Media Double-Standard – by Bob Cesca, Host of The Bob & Chez Show, Media Producer, May 16, 2012

USA: The Rise of Black-on-White Violence – by Ozzie Saffa, May 15, 2012

Making excuses on behalf of black criminals

Then of course we have the tendency of government, academics and the media to produce excuses for the violence.

It is to be expected that all blacks found guilty of any crime during the period 1652 and 1994 are today assumed as having been innocent victims of the ruthless, inhumane Apartheid system. As far as the world is concerned all blacks found guilty during that period were all innocent

Also remember that the media never makes mistakes and they are always “victims” of the current regime or system, wherever they are – Independent Newspapers’ Submission to the TRC, Section 4: Victims of apartheid. The media were victims of Apartheid, they are victims of the “land of the free”, the USA, they are victims on every country everywhere in the world.

Courts Take Violent Revenge

(From “Murder on the Mines: Who is guilty?“)

By lending protection to some while punishing others for their violence, the court has discriminated against the mineworkers. What is more, in reality the court is as much an agent of violence as the security guards or the workers. The imposition of the death penalty is an act of violent revenge. The court becomes just another violent actor on the South African political stage.

This shows that “the law” is not an objective set of rules governing “normal” behaviour in society. Rather the law is created and shaped by various social institutions – parliament, the universities, state bureaucracies, the courts. These institutions themselves reflect and maintain the injustices of South Africa. As a result, the courtroom becomes a microcosm of society in South Africa – reflecting its injustices rather than remedying them.

Indeed, at a time when political debate and demands are suppressed by law, the courts have become the sterile forum in which political and economic debates are contested. Workers, trade unionists and treason trialists alike, find themselves arguing for their very lives in the courtrooms of South Africa. Their “defences” and often their arguments “in mitigation” are based on their experience of South African society and its injustices.

Numerous articles on the denial of truth can be found at : Violence and Violence Prevention

Liberals will always generate excuses for murders committed by blacks and the following is but one example of this tendency:

“Farmers are killed in South Africa every week and for some reason the killing of one farmer (Terre’Blanche) has made the international media. What is not reported is that on many farms the labourers are treated badly by their employers; some are exploited and treated with no dignity. In some parts of South Africa apartheid never ended and it’s causing anger – an anger that leads to murder.” – South Africa’s Ugly Truth, by Pierre Le Roux

It seems whites are never mistreated by their employees, whites are never underpaid, abused or fired by their employees, because we do not see whites killing their employees or ex-employees, yet when blacks kill farmers, they were angry. He who perceives himself the underdog or the oppressed, responds by emotion and often by anger which, in his view, warrants his violent murderous reaction thereto. (Perception Controls Behaviour)

I quote the following points from Janine Rauch’s 1991 report, because we need to question why, twenty-one years later, the same excuses are still being put forward:

Current violence in South Africa is undoubtedly the legacy of colonialism and apartheid, but more particularly of a highly militarised state and civil society. Massive dislocation caused by decades of social engineering under apartheid and the rapid pace of early political reform have resulted in chronic social instability. Extreme poverty, racial and ethnic division, and a culture of political intolerance increase the potential for long-term conflict.
The bulk of reported violence in South Africa at this time is violence which is located within social arenas apparently removed from the “political” sphere. Inasmuch as any violence can be said to be non-political, soaring rates of “ordinary crime” and violence are also key features of the transitional period.
The “increase in violent crime” may itself be the result of changes in the social construction of crime statistics. Reporting rates are probably also higher in the post-1990 period than at any point in the preceding two decades.
The “higher crime rate” might also implies a major problem of police ineffectiveness in relation to crime prevention and clear-up rates.
The history of apartheid gives this censure its ideological connotation and political context. Although their rhetorical forms might have become more sophisticated, police versions of the violence continue to rely on racial stereotypes. And if violence is seen as a problem that is both “natural” and particular to black communities, the police can again justify inactivity and ineffective methods.

Public surveys are one of the favourite tools used in an attempt to lend some kind of credibility to the excuses. These surveys, usually conducted among a very small number of well-selected members of the public, are also used to argue against the law abiding citizens’ right to defend themselves and in the fight against legal gun ownership. For example, the results of a national survey of respondents in 2006 in South African urban areas conducted by AC Nielsen. The survey asked people:

“What should be the South African government’s number 1 priority?”

Unemployment was regarded as the overall priority by the greatest number of people (33%) with crime in second place (30%), HIV/AIDS in third (15%) and poverty in fourth place (9%). However, analysis of the results by race and household income reveals more striking differences. Among people in the highest income group (household income of more than R8 000 per month) crime was regarded as the highest priority among 42%, with unemployment being regarded as the highest priority by 24%. Among people in the lower two income groups (household income of between R1 and R3 999 per month) unemployment was regarded as the highest priority by 37% while crime was regarded as the highest priority by between 22% and 23% of respondents. Looked at by race, 38% of African respondents prioritised unemployment, while 21% prioritised crime. On the other hand, 49% of Whites prioritised crime while 21% prioritised unemployment. More Coloured and Indian respondents also gave priority to crime than gave priority to unemployment (AC Nielsen, April 2007 Omnibus Survey, p. 22).

Slightly different results were recorded by the Afrobarometer survey in 2006 where crime is rated as the fifth priority for government action after unemployment, housing, poverty and HIV/AIDS. Crime had for the previous several years held the position of second overall priority among respondents to the Afrobarometer survey. Respondents from all race groups in fact rated unemployment as the priority issue. However, among Whites crime was rated a close second. Among Indians it also achieved second place but received significantly fewer nominations than unemployment. Among Coloureds crime came third after housing. Among Africans it achieved fifth place (Afrobarometer, 2006).

Anger, hatred, or just heartlessness? Defining gratuitous violence

by David Bruce, Institute of Security Studies (ISSAfrica)

“Violent crime in South Africa is sometimes said to be unusual, because it is perceived to frequently be gratuitous. This article engages with the question of how to define gratuitous violence. If the term gratuitous is understood to mean ‘for nothing’, gratuitous violence should be understood as violence that is ‘low on expressive and instrumental motivations’. Whilst the evidence is that much violence is ‘instrumental’, violence in South Africa may be unusual but it may be better to articulate this in terms of the concepts both of ‘expressive’ and gratuitous violence. Gratuitous violence and the apparent cruelty that characterises some acts of instrumental violence also appear to imply that ’empathy deficits’ might be a characteristic of many perpetrators of violence.”

“Due to their exceptional nature it is consistently the acts involving the greatest degree of cruelty that receive the most attention. Paradoxically, for this reason, they sometimes tend to be seen as the norm and as representative of violence more generally, and play a particularly prominent role in contributing to public fear.”

What these elusive articles deliberately avoid to mention is the GENERAL trend to violently, rape, torture and murder whites by skinning and scalping them, disemboweling them, dismembering them, burning them, tying them up with barbed-wire, using the most unthinkably sadistic methods. Yet according to those liberal journalists who have never experienced it, who have never lost a friends or family this way…..

Things are not as bad as whites are making it out to be

How legitimate are white fears? – by Lucy Holborn, 09 March 2012

Lucy Holborn says “feelings of persecution by some Afrikaners not supported by the facts. The truth behind white fear is not black and white.”

“There is no evidence to suggest that farm attacks, or crime with white victims in general, is motivated by race. In fact, there is research to suggest quite the opposite. Data compiled by Agri SA and the police and published by the Institute in 2003 found that 89% of farm attacks were motivated by robbery, while only 2% were motivated by race. This data is admittedly now relatively old (and the police no longer collect such data), but there is not sufficient evidence to suggest that this pattern has changed dramatically.”

“Every day there are 44 murders, 278 aggravated robberies, and 544 assaults reported to the police. The majority of these violent crimes are not happening on farms, and the majority of the victims of these crimes are probably black because of the racial profile of our population (although the police no longer record the race of victims). Our society is a violent one. Strikes are characterised by violence, so-called service delivery protests are violent, xenophobia manifests itself in violence, and political rivalry sometimes ends in violence. The fact that farm attacks are often violent is part of this norm, not the exception.”

Even with reference to the racist Black Elite Enrichment system, otherwise referred to as Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) and reverse Apartheid, otherwise referred to as “Transformation policies” Lucy Holborn says “The final claim made by those seeking asylum on grounds of discrimination is that policies and legislation such as affirmative action and black economic empowerment are an attempt to exclude whites from the economy. While the claim that such policies are racially discriminative may hold ground – there are both moral and practical arguments against using race on its own as a measure of disadvantage – the facts show that whites are actually doing quite well.”

Please also note, that as always the “Afrikaners” are specifically insulted in the article above, as if the “Afrikaners” are the ones trying to make it seem worse than it really is. For decades the despicable, immoral liberal media have been doing their utmost best to paint the “Afrikaner” as the monster of Africa that deserves what he gets and is now crying fowl.

But What is the Real Situation on Black-on-White Violence?

One thing we need to be clear about is the projection of behaviour of a small percentage unto the totality of the group. What this means is that we as humans have tendency to generalise.

A few Army guys walk into a pub, end up in a fight and suddenly all “Army guys” are hooligans. One hundred million people watch soccer, ten thousand behave violently and suddenly “all soccer enthusiasts” are painted as hooligans. A few Afrikaans speaking policemen tortured and killed some black ANC supporters and the world paints “all Afrikaners / Boers” are vicious, violent racist murderers. If 1% of a group behaves in a particular way the whole group pays the price for it.

In the case of blacks there are almost one billion blacks in Africa and, according to official figures, there are at least forty million blacks in South Africa. How many of the 40 million SA blacks have killed whites, or have been involved in armed robberies or other forms of violent crime?

The mistake people make is to project the violent criminal behaviour of a small percentage of blacks unto the entire black South African population. It is for this reason, and because liberals do not have the ability to think, that the media, liberal churches and liberal political parties become over-protective. Instead of admitting the problem, admitting that those blacks who do murder do so in the most inhumane ways imaginable, they deny any reference to black on white violence.

Instead of admitting that there is a concerted effort to instigate violence against whites with the specific purpose of wiping them out, taking everything they own and posses, the liberal world chooses to rather deny it.

What we need to acknowledge is that there is a definite onslaught against whites world-wide, but particularly in South Africa. This onslaught is not an onslaught from the entire black population of South Africa. The onslaught is driven by a few who are influencing a particular sector of the black population, particularly the poor blacks, the black youth and the black unemployed, who tend to be more susceptible to crime and emotional manipulation.

The Black Crime Situation in the USA

I’ll be using the USA as reference, because they actually maintain reasonable statistics and because blacks (African Americans) make up only 13% of the entire US population.

Haiti, being the oldest / first black-led republic in the world (since 1804), would probably have been the most ideal, but their statistics cannot be trusted and it would be unfair to use such a terribly violent black society as the standard. Haiti‘s largest slum in the capital of Port-au-Prince, has been called “the most dangerous place on Earth” by the United Nations.

America has a huge prison population of two million, over half of which consists of African-Americans. This is despite their minority status in the USA, comprising only 12% of an overall population amounting to 290 million. – Violent “black on white” Crime now the Largest Industry in South Africa, by Dan Roodt

Federal Statistics of black on white violence, with links and mathematical extrapolation formulas

By Ken LaRive

August 1, 2009

The “New Century Foundation” studies Federal crime reports, and found significant differences in crime ratio between races, verified by the FBI’s NCVS, National Crime Victimization Survey, and The Department of Justice’s UCR, Uniform Crime Reports, FBI Communication’s Division, 304-625-4995.

The following was taken from the New Century Foundation’s “The Color of Crime (2005)”

They state emphatically that the Judicial System is not biased against non-whites.
The best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percent of the population that is black and Hispanic.
Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.
Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.
Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics are three times more likely.
Blacks are three times more likely to use a hand gun, and twice more likely to use a knife.
Blacks are 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against whites then vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit a robbery.
Forty-five percent of black crime is against whites, 43 against other blacks, and 10 percent against Hispanic.
Blacks are seven times more likely to go to prison, Hispanics three times, and the reason is clear, because from 1980 to 2003 the US incarceration rate has tripled, and so proves that Justice is not only hard won, but well served.
Hispanics commit three times more violent crimes than whites, but the statistics are nebulous because sometimes they are classified as white, so it could be far higher.
Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate.
Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.

Black and other nonwhite violence against whites: a grim collection

(It is well-worth visiting this page as it provides an extensive overview of the problem in the US)

“These terrible things are happening, they seem to be happening more and more frequently, and for our own safety and survival we need to know about it, instead of ignoring it and covering it up as the mainstream media with the compliance of whites have been doing for the last 40 years.”

According to New FBI data the ten most dangerous cities in America all have non-white majority populations

The FBI’s Uniform Crime Report listed the 10 US cities with populations of 100,000 or more with the highest rates of violent crime per 1,000 residents.

The US Government defines ‘White’ as ‘a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.

This article should serve as a shocking revelation to denialist liberals and certainly worth reading. The article makes reference to another article “‘Minorities’ [non-white] responsible for majority of all violent crimes in London“, which is also well worth reading.

Is it a Black on White violence problem or is it a Black Violence Problem?

Even if were were to ignore the black on white violence we are still left with black on black violence. Whether it is black on white, black on black, black tribal conflict, black party political intolerance, the violence is committed by blacks.

Let us put things in perspective by first referring you to “How evil was Apartheid” By Albert Brenner, which also includes Vusile Tshabalala’s well-known and well-publicised article “How many blacks died under apartheid?” and which he states the following fact “There are more people murdered in piecefull democratic South Africa in any three years under ANC rule than was killed in the ten years the full scale Vietnam War lasted!” The TRC’s reports are available here. For more information on the TRC click here.

If black leaders continue denying the problem and allow the immoral white liberals to continue hiding and denying the problem, blacks will continue suffering black on black violence. If all whites left South Africa no one could accuse blacks of black on white violence, but the black on black violence would continue, because it is a black violence problem.

Blacks should stop allowing immoral white liberals to lead them to their ultimate demise. Liberals are weakly weasels too scared of stepping on toes, because they fear any form of confrontation. Liberals appease blacks, because they are scared of blacks, because they hope that by always going along with everything blacks say and do and by always saying everything they know blacks would like to hear, they would be left alone and be safe. In short a liberal is best described as follows – “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile – hoping it will eat him last.” – Winston Churchill

In August 2001 the SA Police published their Crime Statistics for the period 1994 to 2000, which showed that a total of 174,220 people died violent deaths, from crime-related violence during that period. In that very same year the city of Amsterdam in the Netherlands – with only 5,6 murders per 100,000 population – was declared the “murder capitol of Europe”, while Johannesburg, with 61.2 murders per 100,000 population in the year 2000, remained the world’s murder city for the fourth year running. (According to Wikipedia “Murders in the Johannesburg municipality amounted to 1,697 in 2007 according to the South African Medical Research Council, a rate of 43 per 100,000 inhabitants.”)

A United States Department of Justice report which surveyed homicide statistics between 1974 and 2004 stated that of the crimes surveyed, 52.2% of the offenders were Black, while blacks are only 12% of the US population. A 2010 United States Department of Justice report which surveyed homicide statistics during the year of 2010 reports that the 49% of all murder or manslaughter arrests were of white individuals. While African-Americans make only 12% of the population, 48% of murder or manslaughter arrests were black individuals.

According to the American Bureau of Justice Statistics from 2000 to 2008:

the rate of prevalence of incarceration for blacks was 3,161 per 100,000; and
the white rate was 487 per 100,000.
In 2009 American Indians and Alaskan Natives were jailed, paroled, or on probation at 932 per 100,000, 25% higher than for non-Indians/Natives (747), 12% higher than 2007. However, crime in general declined during this time down to near 1970 levels, an 18% decrease from the previous decade.

For men in their early thirties, African-Americans are about 7 times more likely to have a prison record than whites. They are more likely to have been in prison (22.4 percent) than in the military (17.4 percent).

African Americans are given longer federal sentences than Whites who are sentenced for the same or equivalent crimes, even when factoring criminal records. African American jail sentences tend to be roughly 60% longer than white jail sentences for the same crimes, regardless of the length of or existence of any criminal history.

Interestingly enough, more blacks are enrolled in college than in prison. According to the US Census Bureau as of the year 2000 there were 2,224,181 blacks enrolled in college. In that same year there were only 610,300 black inmates in prison according to the Bureau of Justice. (Ref:Race and Crime in the US)

The following is quoted from a recent article published by the British National Party –

“The latest piece of evidence that emphasizes a clear correlation between increased non-white immigration and soaring crime figures.

An earlier report from County Durham Patriots already showed that non-whites commit the majority of all violent crimes in London, despite still being a minority of the city’s population.

And it seems that trend is continued across the pond, or, in fact, wherever there reside non-white populations.”

But what about the racial killing ratio? These are the exact figures obtained from the US Department of Justice – 2009.

By 2009 about 13% of the US population was black. About 80% were white (this number includes Hispanics).

In 2009, 2,963 white individuals were killed by white offenders. White offenders killed 209 black individuals.

In that same year, 2,604 black individuals were killed by black offenders. And 454 white individuals were killed by black offenders.

As we see, there is cross-racial deadly violence, but offenders mainly cause victims within their own race; it is so-called intra-racial.

What about recent decades? Murders surveyed between 1974 and 2004 show that 52% of the offenders were black, 48% were white. Of the victims, 51% were white, 47% were black.

In that period, 86% of white murders had whites offenders, and 94% of black murders had black offenders.

The main problem for young black men is not violent white men chasing them. It is black on black violence.

According to US Bureau of Justice data for 1976-2005, American blacks, who are only 13 percent of the population, killed 692 whites while non-hispanic whites, who are 72 percent of the population, killed 254 blacks. “This is an enormous difference indicating blacks are more than 15 times as likely to kill whites than the reverse,” according to the website Destructure

The number of net cross-racial violence in 2009 shows that blacks killed more than twice as many whites as whites killed by whites. Blacks killed 245 more whites, than whites killed by whites themselves. Please bear in mind that by 2009 blacks were only 13% of the US population, yet they killed twice as many whites.

Given the actual percentage of population that is black vs white (13 vs 80), and normalising the actual murder counts, then whites are killed by blacks at a rate 5 times that of blacks killed by whites… 454 whites killed by 13% of population vs 209 blacks killed by 80% of the population.

That is, normalising, roughly 35 white people are killed by 1 % of the population (who are black) and 2.6 black people are killed by a comparable 1% of the population who are white. A white person’s chance of being killed by a black person is 13.5 times greater than a black being killed by a white. Put another way, if there were the same number of blacks and whites in the population, and given the existing rate of race on race murders, while there were 209 blacks killed by whites there would be more that 1000 whites killed by blacks.

The violent nature of black on white killings in the US is also no different. In just one of many examples, on March 4, 2012 a 13 year old white teen from Kansas City was doused with gasoline and set on fire by two 16 year old black teens, in what investigators are calling a racial hate crime. Yet again the mainstream media paid no attention and there was no party-political outrage? Why not, simply because it is not the politically correct thing to do.

It is simply the fact that blacks are killing whites at a rate far greater that whites are killing blacks and to pretend otherwise turns racial animosity on its head. The truth is inconvenient to the media and the black community that continuously plays the victim instead of recognising its own responsibilities to society. Where are the marches when a white is raped or tortured and murdered by a black person? Are there so many whites that the murder of one just doesn’t matter?

The problem is, black politicians, black leaders, white liberals, churches and the media have refused to accept it, as it does not agree with the narrative of victimhood.

Call it racism, refer to it as racial discrimination, but the fact is that we have a problem, a black violence problem. In the US “Most of the black murder victims – 93 percent – were killed by other black people,” (Feds: 49% Of Murder Victims Are Black Men) Even if we were to remove all whites from the planet, the black violence problem would still remain.

You can find huge amounts of shocking earlier US data at The Unspoken American Genocide.

Further reading:

‘Race Wars’ Part 1: The Shocking Data on Black-on-Black Crime

Study: Almost Half of Murder Victims Black

Violence and Crime in South Africa

“The FBI keeps a list of its 10 most wanted criminals. In South Africa, police have their 247,000 most wanted” list (South Africa to hunt “247,000 most wanted” with billboards)

Each day an average of nearly 50 people are murdered in South Africa.

In addition to these 18,000 murders each year, there are another 18,000 attempted murders.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder

In the run up to the 2010 FIFA World Cup one British newspaper put it as follows, “Cape Town’s culture of gangsters, drugs, rape, robbery and a murder every 25 minutes“

According to Dr. Johan Burger, senior researcher in the crime and justice program at South Africa’s Institute for Security Studies, “What is important to understand about our high crime rate is that we know from research that approximately 80% of our murders happen within a very specific social context, mostly between people that know one another.”

In blunt terms, areas with problems have murder levels that can be wildly above the national average.

In 2010 Kwa Mashu, a township outside Durban in KwaZulu-Natal, was honoured with being dubbed South Africa’s murder capital by the media, with 300 murders in 2009. It took the unwanted honour from Nyanga, a township outside Cape Town.

South Africa’s national figure of 203,777 episodes of “assault with the intent to inflict grievous bodily harm” is alarming. It’s hard to compare this with other countries like the UK where statistics are grouped differently, and UK has a larger population (61 million compared with South Africa’s 49 million.)

Of the 18,438 house robberies in South Africa in 2009, 8,122 were in the province of Gauteng, which includes Johannesburg. In Gauteng the likelihood of being a victim is twice the national average.

Notwithstanding the fact that official South African crime statistics cannot be trusted, it is still worthy of mention, particularly as it relates to this article.

In 2007 Dr. Pieter Mulder, leader of the Freedom Front Plus Party, told the Inter Press Service News Agency (IPS) in an interview;

“In three years, 2.5 million people fell victim to violent crimes such as murder, attempted murder, and robbery at private homes. This means more than 848,000 people fall victim to violent crime in South Africa every year,”

“From 1994 up to now, 272,000 people were murdered in South Africa. There is an increase of 8.3 percent in house robbery. These are the statistics of the police themselves,” Mulder said. “This means people are feeling unsafe in their homes. And this makes South Africa the most unsafe country to live in.”

“The world average for murder is five in every 100,000 of the population. In South Africa the figure is 40 in every 100,000. If this figure is compared to the world figures, South Africa is experiencing a very serious crime crisis which should immediately be acknowledged and addressed by government,”

“What is worse is that on average only 10 percent of criminal cases end up in court,” he added.

In 2011 the minister of police bragged that South Africa’s murder rate had, according to official statistics, fallen by 6.5 percent to a total 15,940 – the lowest number since the ANC took control of the country. In the meantime, reported rapes went up from 55,097 to 56,272.

While one cannot trust the accuracy official crime statistics, South Africa’s politicians find it necessary to find scape-goats for the crime, by comparing South Africa with countries like Brazil. (SA murder rate halves)

South Africa is the Official Rape Capitol of the World

South Africa has been referred to as the “Rape Capitol of the World” since at least 2002 already.

South Africa, world’s rape capital: Interpol
Thursday 19 April 2012 18:23
In 2012 South Africa is STILL the Rape Capitol of the World: “Interpol says South Africa is the world’s rape capital and less than 1% of rape cases are reported to police.” and according to the SABC article “a woman born in South Africa is more likely to be raped than educated. It’s estimated a woman is raped every 17 seconds.”
In May 2012 it was even acknowledged in the SA Parliament that “According to Interpol, South Africa is the rape capital of the world with less than 1% of rapes reported to the police.” DA: Lamoela: Address by Democratic Alliance Shadow Minister of Women, Children and People with Disabilities, budget vote, Parliament (11/05/2012)

One in four South African men questioned in a survey said they had raped someone, and nearly half admitted having attacked more than one victim. The study, by South Africa’s Medical Research Council, also found three that of four who admitted they had raped had attacked for the first time during their teens already. It said practices such as gang rape were common because they were considered a form of male bonding.

The Killing of Whites Continues: South Africa
American Dissident Voices Broadcast of September 28, 2002
Kevin Alfred Strom: “And South Africa is also the rape capital of the world. A woman is reported raped every 23 seconds in South Africa. A small child is reported raped every thirty minutes. And remember, these are the reported and admitted rapes. This dismal record is partly due to the Congoids’ innate savagery when released from the control of civilized men, and partly due to the Black folk belief that raping a virgin will cure AIDS, which is rampant in that country.”

South Africa: Rape capital of the world
In 2009 it was reported that “Nearly ten percent said their first experience of coercive sex was when they were ten or younger; and most raped for the first time before age 20.”

‘Corrective rape’ a growing trend in South Africa
‘Corrective’ rape is when a man rapes a lesbian woman or child in order to cure his victim of her lesbianism, essentially to make her go straight.

In other words, the men who are perpetrating this violence, believe that by raping a woman they can turn her into a “real African woman.”

There are no hard statistics to point to just how prevalent or how many of these so-called ‘corrective’ rapes occur because rapes are not classified by sexual orientation in South Africa, nor does the government acknowledge that it is a major issue.

The South African scourge – Aljazeera
Sexual attacks against lesbians, ostensibly to cure them of their ‘unAfrican’ predilection, are on the rise.
“In South Africa there is a scourge even worse than HIV (antiretroviral drugs are readily available now), one that cuts deeper into lives and communities than murder or theft.
It is rape. The numbers reveal that South Africa does rape more profoundly and with more wanton efficiency than anywhere else in the world.
Johannesburg has long been described as the murder capital of the world and South Africa is the world’s rape capital.”

Scourge of ‘corrective rape’
Lesbians in South Africa are often the victims as men seek to “straighten” their sexuality.

Half of South Africa’s young have AIDS from rape
Adriana Stuijt reported in 2009:
“More than 25% of all the females of South Africa, (pop.47-million) even from early babyhood onward, can expect to be raped at least once. Countrywide, last year’s latest available statistics from the SA Child Protection Unit noted that some 16,068 children were reported raped last year – out of the total 36,190 rapes reported. A total of 1,400 children were also among the 18,487 people who were murdered last year.” and “Medical researchers are all in agreement that the main reason why HIV-AIDS is at such a high level in South Africa is rape.”

Child Rape Capitol of the World
“There can be no keener revelation of a society’s soul than the way in which it treats its children.” – Nelson Mandela

South Africa has the highest incidence of child-rape in the world. According to Mandela’s own words the soul of South Africa under the ANC Regime must be the most evil in the world.

Child-rape epidemic in South Africa
Fueled by widespread belief that sex with virgin cures AIDS
“A bizarre belief among many African black men that sex with a virgin – even a child or baby – can cure HIV/AIDS is fueling what is already one of the highest child sexual exploitation rates in the world.”

Baby rapes shock South Africa
“It is also trying to dispel a widespread rumour – that having sex with a virgin cures Aids.
Traditional healers, or witchdoctors, are blamed for spreading this idea, and encouraging child rape.”

And as always South Africa’s black politicians will, rather than address the problems, find someone or something else to blame for their own crimes, failures and shortcomings “Local politician Nomvula Mokanyane says that under apartheid, African men were stripped of power and prestige. Now they take their revenge on women, and on tiny children.”

CHILD RAPE – A Cry From Africa
Shocking New Statistics Reveal Dramatic Rise In Child Rape In Sub-Saharan Africa.

961 Child Rapes A Day In South Africa
by Fred Rundle
With only a population of 40,000 people in the small town of Theunissen, six children are are raped there every week. It must be made clear, all the rapes are committed by Blacks.
The tens of thousands of baby-rapes now routinely taking place in South Africa are also caused by the ongoing claims of so-called “traditional healers” that raping virginal children would cure Aids-sufferers…

Psycho-legal challenges facing the mentally retarded rape victimVolume 17 No. 3 September 2011 – SA Journal of Psychiatry

F J W Calitz, BA Hons, MA (Clin Psychol), DPhil
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein
“Crime is a prominent and perplexing phenomenon in South Africa. It affects people from all races and socio-economic groups, and has far-reaching consequences for victims. Because sexual violence against women and children is rife in South Africa, the country has been branded the ‘rape capital of the world’.

Official statistics for the year ending March 2010 showed an average reported daily crime rate of 47 murders, 177 robberies and 38 car hijackings in South Africa. A total of 71 500 cases of sexual offences were reported to the South African Police Services (SAPS) from April 2008 to March 2009. There were 4 518 instances of sexual offences reported in the Free State province during this period.”

“Despite its prevalence, rape remains one of the most under-reported crimes in South Africa. It has been estimated that only in 35 rapes or attempted rapes are actually reported to the police.”

South Africa: few good men?
A new report suggests that 78 per cent of South African men admit to committing some form of violence against women.

Roots of South Africa’s rape crisis
Alarming statistics on sex crimes prompt nation’s rights groups to push for an open debate on its causes.

Who is doing the Raping?

‘The South African Police have placed a moratorium on the release of statistics. They have now adopted the “let’s keep very quiet and pretend this never happens” approach.’

Shocking statistics:

In South Africa, more than 1 million women and children are raped every year. (The London Times, October 14, 2004)·
Each and every day in South Africa, at least 50 children are victims of rape. (South African Press Association, June 2005)·
More than 90 percent of rape victims know their attackers. (South African Press Association, June 2005)·
A young girl born in South Africa has a greater chance of being raped than of learning how to read. (BBC News, April 2002)·
In South Africa, one in four girls faces the prospect of being raped before her 16th birthday, according to the child support group, Childline South Africa. Source
According to the latest report by South Africa’s Police Service, children are the victims of 41 percent of all rapes and attempted rapes reported in the country.

Every country and nation on earth battles with rape, but no one as seriously and hugely as South Africa. The question we need to ask ourselves is, who is doing it?
Who is committing “corrective rape” to cure lesbians of their ‘unAfrican’ predilection?
Who is raping children, babies and toddlers as a “cure for HIV/AIDS”?
Who considers it their “right to rape”?
Who considers rape “a form of male bonding”?

The honest non-politically correct answer is blacks!

Professor Rachel Jewkes of the MRC, who carried out the research, told a BBC’s World Today program: “The absolute imperative is we have to change the underlying social attitudes that in a way have created a norm that coercing women into sex is on some level acceptable. We know that we have a higher prevalence of rape in South Africa than there is in other countries. And it’s partly rooted in our incredibly disturbed past and the way that South African men over the centuries have been socialized into forms of masculinity that are predicated on the idea of being strong and tough and the use of force to assert dominance and control over women, as well as other men.”

Was he referring to whites? Is it a white problem? Did whites instill this culture of rape among black men? No certainly not. It is a black problem that can only be addressed and solved by blacks themselves.

Serial Killers in South Africa

It is interesting to note that Wikipedia’s list South African of serial killers include only two whites (Daisy de Melker and Gert van Rooyen) and one coloured (Norman Afzal Simons).

“Some 3,500 South Africans were hanged over the last century. ‘Of these,’ only, ‘130 were patriots whose only crime was fighting oppression.’ the rest were all found guilty of criminal murder unrelated to politics.” See –

Is this the most ghoulish tourist attraction in the world? Gallows where 3,500 were hanged declared a national monument in South Africa ; and

Gallows to return as a means to ‘heal’ ; or

Google search : How many blacks were hanged under apartheid

According to True Crime Library, there were 76 executions in South Africa in 1960, of which only two involved white men.

On November 14th, 1960 Fifteen people were hanged in South Africa, one white man as opposed to 14 blacks, were executed in Pretoria. For the first time ever in South African judicial history the lone white man’s identity was kept secret to protect his family – he was found guilty of raping his six-year-old daughter.

Of the others, Phineas Tshitaundzi was convicted of raping two white women and robbing three white men, all the crimes having taken place in Pretoria between 1955 and 1959. The other 13 were convicted of murder.

On September 5th, 1961 Elizabeth Khambule and 16 other blacks were hanged in South Africa. Elizabeth Khambule was hanged with two accomplices for the murder of a white woman in Johannesburg in October 1960.

Nine black men were hanged for the murder of nine policemen in January 1960. One black man was hanged for “violent” burglary, while another was executed for raping two white women in Cape Town. The other three were all convicted of murder.

Of course all the blacks hanged during Apartheid will be made out as “racist” murders, simply because they were black and the government was white. Nevertheless, the fact remains that in the US where blacks are only about 12% of the total population, they have always filled the US prison. In SA where blacks are almost 80% of the population they fill the prisons.

2,214 people died from SAPS actions and while in custody in 2009-2011

245 people died while in SAPS custody in 2010/2011 book-years, down from 294 the previous year. Deaths in custody as a result ofSA Police Service (SAPS) actions or involvement dropped from 860 in 2009/2010 to 797 in the 2010/2011 book-year.

South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Committee (TRC) found that only 73 people died while in (Apartheid) SA Police detention during the entire period from 1963 to 1990 (http://bit.ly/ADQoYj)

‘No one truly knows a nation, until one has been inside its jails. A nation should not be judged by how it treats its highest citizens, but rather its lowest ones,’ said by South Africa’s most famous prisoner, Nelson Mandela, in A Long Walk to Freedom.

What does that say about Apartheid versus the New South Africa under the ANC?

Killing of Whites in South Africa

If South Africa’s ANC Regime has nothing to hide, why are they hiding crime statistics?

It is impossible to find any racial break-down of crimes committed in South Africa and the official crime statistics are not worth the paper it is written on.

Currently, estimates for the number of illegal firearms in circulation in South Africa range from 500 000 to 4 million (Ibid 2005: 7.), virtually all of which are the hands of blacks.

In one of the most recent analysis of data on non-natural deaths collected through the Medical Research Council’s National Injury Mortality Surveillance System (NIMSS), released in 2005, the study found that, “The leading external cause of death was firearms (20,1%), followed by sharp force injury (15,9%)”. This is consistent with trends since data collection by the NIMSS began in 1999. (ref – Medical Research Council 2005)

This does not paint a good picture of things to come.

It is said that close to 4000 farmers have been murdered in South Africa since 1994. Amazingly there seems to be no reliable statistics on this.

In 2010 the ANC Regime’s Minister of Police admitted that no stand-alone statistics have been kept on farm attacks and farm murders since 2006/2007.

Seeing as there are no trust-worthy crime statistics in SA we could easily assume that more than 1 million whites have been murdered since the ANC were put in control back in 1994. While that would be a wild assumption, it would not be an exaggeration, because in this country whites are being murdered like flies.

Farmitracker provides updated data on attacks, but sadly the website seldom functions properly.

1987-2003 Chronological rural murder lists Crime Busters of SA. By May 2003 the number of rural deaths stood at 1,549. The following is quoted from the original website “The mass slaughter of our South African farmers and their workers must stop. The murder rate amongst this sector our SA society stands at 313 per 100,000 – the highest for any sector.“
Note: The original website should be avoided, because it was hacked and contains malicious Trojan-Horse viruses.

The 313/100,000 was calculated when 1,549 white farmers had been murdered. The number of white farmers murdered has more than doubled since then.

Labour Union Solidarity lists 1637 farm attacks on Commercial Farms Only – Solidariteit List From January 1993 To Early June 2009 (a .Pdf document)

8 December 2008 I Luv South Africa reported “This latest mysterious so-called ‘farm murder’ in South Africa — in which nothing was robbed and as usual, massive violence, often including torture and mutilation, was used against the unarmed victim, brings the total of ‘white’ South African farm-dwellers killed since 1994 to 3,025 people.”

On 5 February 2009 a Digital Journal article written by Adriana Stuijt stated “3,035th white farmer shot dead in South Africa in front of wife”

CENSORBUGBEAR REPORTS 11 November 2010 : The UK newspaper The Times reported on March 28 2010 that “white farmers are ‘being wiped out’” and that the banned ANC genocidal hatespeech song “shoot the boer” was fanning the flames.

“More white farmers have been killed in peacetime South Africa than British soldiers in two warzones…”

The Sunday Times wrote that ‘death has stalked South Africa’s white farmers for years. The number murdered since the end of apartheid in 1994 has passed 3000. By 4 November 2010 The list of murdered white farmers kept up to date by CENSORBUGBEAR REPORTS stood at 3752.

By April 2011 CENSORBUGBEAR REPORTS placed the Estimated Death Toll of white Farmers at 3,805 and added that “about 96% of all the attack victims are ‘whites” and over 98% of the attackers are black-Africans who often arrive from cities hundreds of miles away, carry out reconnnaisance for several weeks before they attack in organised, militia-style fashion; We do not record any such crimes committed in family- or relationship-feuding in rural regions.”

The Truth About South Africa – White Genocide In South Africa – Politically Motivated Murders in South Africa from 1994 to 2012states: “Since 1994, an estimated 68798 white South Africans have been murdered of which 4041 were commercial farmers. True figures are very hard to come by as the South African police fail to report most of the murders that take place. There is also no distinction between white and black victims in crime records.
As the white population of South Africa was 4 434 697 according to the official state census in 1996, and more than 400 000 white South Africans have left the country, it could be estimated that nearly 2% of white South Africans have been murdered in the 18 years of democracy.” (The article is not dated, but seems to have been published in June 2012)

An article by Oz Conservative said: “Why isn’t there more international attention focused on the fate of the Boers? One reason is that the Western middle-class is ideologically committed to the idea that whites are privileged oppressors and therefore are immune from persecution. They cannot bring themselves to recognise the vulnerable position of whites in South Africa, particularly the white farmers living in isolation on farms. Nor, perhaps, are they aware of the real poverty of some of the Boers in South Africa, who are given the lowest priority when it comes to employment.”

SA murders exceed road deaths
South Africa is the only country where one is more likely to be murdered than to be killed in a road accident, an SA Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR) survey has found.
“That our murder rate exceeds killings on the roads does not mean that road fatalities are low, only that our high murder rate is even higher than our high road fatality rate,” researcher Kerwin Lebone said on Monday.
The study was based on information from the road traffic corporation and the police for the 2010/11 financial year ending last March.
It found that 32 South Africans per 100 000 died as a result of being murdered, while 28 per 100 000 died in road accidents.

The Numbers Game

According to The South African Pocket Digest 1988, in 1987 South Africa’s total population was 29,025,000, of which 4,911,000 were whites, of which 2,465,328 were Afrikaans speaking.

As of 2012 SA has an estimated total population of between 48,810,427 and 49,991,300 and figures as high as 51 million have been published. The ANC Regime has no clue how many people are really residing in South Africa.

As of the census of 2001, there were 4,293,638 Whites residing in South Africa.

Since 1994, approximately 940,000 white South Africans have permanently emigrated.

From the above it should be quite obvious that there cannot be more than 3,900,000 whites left in South Africa. Add to that the number of whites murdered since 1994, killed on our most dangerous roads, committing suicide and it means that the total white population is probably much less than 3.9 million.

Whites declined from 22% in 1911, to 16% in 1980 and by mid-year 2010 were only 9.2% of the total SA population (9.6% in 2001). There most probably much fewer whites left in SA today than in 2010.

Read “A Lesson in Mathematics South African Style” and you would realise that the SA population is much closer to 100 million than 50 million and that whites are probably less than 5% of the total population by now.

The number of food-producing commercial farms in South Africa has dropped from 85,000 in 1994 to a mere 11,500 this year [2008], according to SA tax records. This has in turn also caused massive unemployment among farm-workers: 1,2million were employed on white-owned farms in 1994, only 360,000 now remain.

According to a survey for the period 1998–2000 compiled by the United Nations, South Africa was ranked second for murder and first for assaults and rapes per capita. Nearly 50 murders are committed each day in South Africa. Total crime per capita is 10th out of the 60 countries in the data set.

Simple theft could not be used to explain the full motive of the attacks as it was not necessary to torture or murder victims in order to rob them

In 2001, 61% of farm attack victims were white, while whites only made up 9,6% of the population.
Perpetrators tended to be young, unemployed black men
Only a small proportion of attacks involved murder, although the rate of murder had increased by 25% since 2005

Occupy South Africa: “we are all kings and queens!”
“over the last six years of war in Iraq, more South Africans died from murder alone than the total number of people killed there over the same period, the biggest warzone of the 21st century. In fact more South Africans are murdered in one year than the total number of civilians and soldiers combined in ten years of war in Afghanistan, the longest ongoing war of the 21st century.”

In war ravaged Iraq 2,100 people died in the first six months of 2012, which means that more than four times as many people were murdered in South Africa during the same six month period. This means that it is at least four times more dangerous to live in South Africa than in Iraq.

South African Murders Hit Scary Rate
“Statistically a South African is 12 times as likely to be murdered than the average American and his chances of being killed are50 times greater than if he lived in western Europe.”

Thanks to the ANC regime’s manipulation of the murder statistics the impression is being created that crime and murder in SA is declining, a lie if there ever was one.

The Ratio of Whites Murdered in South Africa

If the SA population stands at 50 million

SA White population is 4 million
68,798 whites murdered over 18 years comes to 3822 each year since 1994
3822/40
= 95,56/100,000 whites

On average 18,000 people are murdered in SA each year.

Total remaining SA population is 46 million
18,000 – 3822 = 14178
14,112/460
= 30,82/100,000

This means that whites are being murdered at three times the rate of the remaining SA population.

Read “Civil War Called Crime“ published 30 June 2012

But what if the above stats are incorrect and exaggerated? Does it change the fact that thousands of whites are being raped, murdered and maimed in SA? Does it change the fact that thousands of blacks are being raped, murdered, burned, tortured and maimed in SA? Does it change the fact that virgins and babies are being raped by their thousands each year? So lets say our stats are wrong and the ANC regime is lying about the 18,000 murders annually. Lets say only 1000 whites are murdered annually and that 17,000 blacks are murdered each year. Does it change the fact that blacks have a violence problem? Does it change the fact the Interpol awarded us the number one prize for rape in the world? Does it change the fact that the whole world KNOWS SA farmers have the most dangerous job in the entire world?

So please go ahead and accuse me of sucking these figures from my thumb, it does not change the fact that your virgin baby girl stands a very good chance of being raped at anytime. If my calculations are based on wrong figures, thanks to the liberals as-crawlers and their beloved ANC hiding the real stats to fool the world, does it change the fact that more people are murdered in SA every year than in any other war on the entire planet?

So please go ahead, make my day, argue the stats, deny as much as you like, because you stand the same chance of being mugged, raped, tortured and murdered in SA as everyone else. Nothing any liberals ass-crawler can say will change the fact that SA has the second most consulates and embassies in the world and they channel the news back to their countries, which means in the eyes of the world South Africa will remain the Rape Capitol of the World, the Gangster’s Paradise, the Murder Capitol of the World, the Drug Capitol of the World and the Fraud and Corruption Capitol of the World and you are being associated with it as much as I am. He who denies and hides the crime, supports the crime and is as criminal as the criminal himself.

Who is Committing Most of the Crime, Rapes and Killing?

Seeing as African countries are too incompetent to maintain statistics, and that the ANC Regime has too much to hide, and that the liberal world, together with their media are doing everything in their power to hide the truth about race and crime, we shall address the issue from another angle.

Who is committing most of the killing of African Americans?
Who is committing almost 100% of the killing of blacks in Haiti?
Who is committing almost 100% of the killings of blacks in Africa?
Who is committing almost 100% of the killing of white farmers in South Africa?
Who is committing 2.25 times more hate crimes against US whites than whites themselves?
Who is committing 100% of “corrective rapes” in South Africa?
Who is committing almost 100% of all armed robberies in South Africa?
Who is committing 100% the raping of babies and virgins as a “cure for HIV/AIDS” in South Africa?

Who committed 92% of all black killings during the entire apartheid period?

Who committed (and invented) the “black-on-black necklace murders”?

Who is committing almost 100% of all vehicle high-jackings in South Africa?

Who is committing the most heinous raping and most inhumane torturing of their white victims before murdering them?

Who is committing 100% of all murders in black townships?

Who is committing 100% of all rapes in black townships?

The answer is NOT WHITES, but BLACKS!

Remember Jesse Jackson’s words: “There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the streets and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved … after all we have been through. Just to think we can’t walk down our own streets, how humiliating.” This was based on the sobering statistics; of the 9,000 African-Americans who are murdered annually, of which 93 percent are killed by blacks.

Blacks have a serious problem that only they themselves can deal with. Even if all whites were to be killed off or driven from South Africa, blacks would continue suffering under their tribal party-political undisciplined black-on-black violence problem.